It's not apples vs oranges in case individuals would use the TDI as a momentum indior like it ought to be used, vs. an entry single. Take a 1 2 3 entry in conjunction.Originally Posted by ;
![]() |
![]() |
It's not apples vs oranges in case individuals would use the TDI as a momentum indior like it ought to be used, vs. an entry single. Take a 1 2 3 entry in conjunction.Originally Posted by ;
By using tdi or Some Other indior to wait for Verifiion will always be late it's to by Character and Together with the Theme of buying lower selling Greater will be removed Awaiting an indior that Is why we Revealed the difference in Studying and being led by price action and being led by any indior so we will Return to our thread and hope those who do the research will discover this Fact
Emmanuel, could you please elaborate on that timing vs loion point you mentioned? This seems pertinent but I an not sure how to translate it.Originally Posted by ;
thanks
I agree, but not always late... I still use the TDI indior in expectation of trend change or continuation of the current trend. Occasionally, it looks ahead of fundamentals. With regards to price action... I concur with other traders that stated that PA indiors are only the same... click https://www.tradeciety.com/is-price-...-than-indiors/ for more info.Originally Posted by ;
";Technicals go just with fundamentals behind it. Technicals move ahead of Fundamentals; Market buys (or sells) on expectation of profit. Always, it is an intuition for profit. And whatever worries there are #8212; political, social or economic #8212; are calculated risks in company. ";
#9755; Why Technicals move ahead of Fundamentals?
";Occasionally, too much speculation pushes the price and added with some greed, the technical will direct too much before its fundamentals that will get the price to correct, consolidate. . .then either it breaks outside to begin, resume or end a trend. ";
By the way, I noticed that you use Market Profile... I enjoy it in my day-to-day trading analysis.
Enjoy it if a member post a contradictio: (v2vboni - click https://www.tradeciety.com/is-price-...-than-indiors/ for more information)
Looking at the last post's where member's blasted TDI = everything now?
that I love the older 'Fundamentals' vs 'Technical analysis' argument.
Well, I for one, couldn't care less about 'Fundies'. Everything I need to know is at a chart.
Here is a complete article about Trump and regarding his policy towards the $
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/econ...41X?li=BBoPWjQ
Does he need a weaker dollar or does not he? Etc
Now here is a chart I created of the DX in a year ago;
Okay, so in the chart, I wanted one more high... a pattern I would certainly not call again now if I were to attempt to label it. In reality the 123, activate and retrace in the top could have been fine, particularly if wave two of 'C' was intermittent.
Well, my point is, that applying EW, revealed that we can expect big falls from that area over 2017/2018 as we fix the whole upmove, or pullback within an 'X' wave, either way, it has the same result;
So tell me, didn't need to understand what Trump's policy could be on the $ a year ago?
CableOriginally Posted by ;
Can you submitted that a year ago you'd have had a rock solid proof that anything you're using is working. Now it is meaningless, for any member can use a chart from a year ago, plot some lines and say: '' I told you (hindsight trading)
Well, the only sensible answer I can provide you to that.... Is that I do not believe I have anything to prove to anyone besides myself.Originally Posted by ;
I am not in the habit of keeping clean charts from a year ago, so that I can doctor them up to make myself look like any kind of guru.
I can find many many charts that I've posted previously, frequently at odds with some big named 'hotshot' advisors and proved precisely the same as my prior post. EW can be quite very accurate if combined together with fibs...
You have to have thick skin to post your charts, thoughts or anything at all, for that matter online. There was a time that I would have been affected by this kind of accusation, but now, I just laugh)
I laugh because of just how absurd your accusation seems (to me).
Did I exchange the chart I published? NO! Would wait for a year to see any results?!
I will direct you to your creativity and thoughts. My point was only that I do not think in listening to fundamentals. TA in today's era, is.
Dow theory says fundamentals are priced into the market Only Examine the chart
IMO:... certainly you do not, because that has been your trading style at the time... do not you? .Originally Posted by ;
The fact that the price up a little, but not level with your C or didn't create the E as you've expected it to be until the price goes down, wherein the chart pattern analysis was based on your prior amount of EW understanding a year ago. Thus, it's difficult to imagine what exactly in your mind... likely you're waiting for the price to make your D or E.
But now... It is simpler to say that after the fact. Hayzzz... If only we've got a crystal ball or a time machine. ; )-