I read your posts there and seemed your own testing. With that analyzing Holy Graaails comes to developers.
Basically I'll be intrested if you test it with at least 89% quality.
This evaluation using control point only is useless
I read your posts there and seemed your own testing. With that analyzing Holy Graaails comes to developers.
Basically I'll be intrested if you test it with at least 89% quality.
This evaluation using control point only is useless
If my evaluation was using control points afterward that was accident
my ea transactions on receptive price just and I test on receptive price only
its up to you to test with 89% caliber
I did that after years back and the results were exactly the same
so I dont bother anymore
Originally Posted by ;
Good Yes please post some directions on what all the settings mean and I noticed you have True or False for enabling all indiors to concur for a sign but does one have that choice for entry AND/OR depart indiors.Originally Posted by ;
Like when I need all indiors to agree with Entry and Exit or if I need all to agree to ONLY entry or ONLY exit.
Thanks
Hey matrix
I will this weekend
or in the evenings, I gotta go to work
its an extremely busy week for me
Originally Posted by ;
Thanks, ok. Additionally, can you add an option so that if the EA closes a transaction on a QQE cross since it is moving in the opposite direction which closed the former transaction, to open a different transaction right away if all of indiors nevertheless agree on the Entry sign.
Due
The ea can do so
use single entry false
and only use qqea to close transactions
Originally Posted by ;
Thank you for the EAs Trendchaser, I've been trialling trendchaser supernova 3 the last couple of days on default settings and it hasnt dropped yet!
Awesome work, many thanks for your efforts
Cal
So if I wished to use 2 signals for entry and All signs to concur for exit, can I?Originally Posted by ;