Well what I was trying to convey was: if there's occasionally a response, but occasionally not, there's got to be a defining ruleset which enables you to exchange them. I.e. in the event that you find something saying how great it works, remember to also put in an explanation what it is that you're really showing.Originally Posted by ;
Personally, this was/is my universe : Yes, price can show response at old lines occasionally, but I've found that there's normally one defining line you want to watch(unless there's a triangle/wedge/pennant like in the later charts, which is always important to watch) and the 1 response I search for is a TL break then retest verifiion of this loss. There's also stations etc, but that is usually another TL with another one which is not THAT important ;p
If you use pitchforks and re-use broken/violated TLs, then I simply have to know why, how it is supposed to work, what it tells me() and where to input, put a stop and at which to aim for, and what it is, which gives the entrance in the first place(in summary: what's the setup, what's the transaction).
Just pointing out a brief: is not this great might be fine as a exclamation of happyness, but it does little to help me comprehend what you're trying to state chartwise and why. The intention of this post is uncertain if it is hard for anybody beyond you(who trades it/can exchange it) to comprehend what it is that you're posting(if it is only useful for you - why make it a article?) . Or at least it was beyond me. I nudged a bit ;p
Not wanting to start a riot