Learning From Unsuccessful Mouteki Trades - The Search for Filters...

Nothing with trying to make something greater but how many pips are you trying to make?

2nd you can just tell if somthing operates over the years... if you keep changing your will never know whether it worked or did not work.

It swing trading and w/ which comes large or bigger ceases... No body want to loose and that I think the mouteki system is worth checking out but I think you have to give it some time.

If you think you found the grail and your going to start making 1000 pips in and month out. I got news for ya mouteki wouldn't ever made the initial post he be to busy sitting around the shore getting some rays... cause the system is really simple and I would just pay a fighter to sit and trade it all day for me...

only my ideas...


turbo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ;

I know and I'm on board to loing appropriate filters. I would also prefer to know and discover out what Mouteki's filters would be. With that said, it is my belief that we as traders sometimes need to be forced to find our own method or tweak a different method (Mouteki platform ) for this to fully utilized by are own trading styles.

AnywaysI look forward to finding filters out there bearing in mind that price action is your core.

---

Thank you Horace something for me simply cleared up. . What in gods name is that gloomy x beneath the candle to the immediate right of the breakout candle.... Now I realise that the x symbolizes no trade because the low isn't reduced then the breakout candle. . THANKS

I am running the Moutaki EA on a demo account and it never took the GU brief so is the filter not part of this EA. . Meaning the EA knows enough now not to enter trade?

Thanks,

Sanchez

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ;

Here we can post screenshots of trades that didn't work out. Perhaps we can come up with filters...

---

Yes this is quite true when you observe the system to precisely how it was designed. . However I think the poster is meaning that if you want to be ultra conservative you could wait for a finished candle on the other side of the demand line that's not touching rather then opening a trade on seeing the open of this candle is on the southside of the demand line.

To me it is logical. . You wont get as many pips on the downside if in fact it moves the direction of the indiors. . However the opposite is true. . You will never lose as many if the trade wasn't meant to be and turns against your standing

Sanchez

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ;

You dont wait for the pub to close. . .just wait for it to transcend the preceding low

---

I would like to thank you also Daerus, you work on filters at another thread was wonderful! Good on you man. We'll think of a killer method.

Finest,
HK

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ;

Hello,

Good thread you started here, as I think we will need to start looking for extra filters (preferably based on price - not lagging indiors).

The filter you mention is a fantastic filter blended with Mouteki, in my opinion. This isn't the time it would have kept us from a fracture. When it is not actually a fictitious break, then we can always re-enter on the next TL break.

---

No worries Sanchez!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ;

Thanks Horace you simply cleared something up for me. . What in gods name is that blue x below the candle into the immediate right of the breakout candle.... I realise the x symbolizes no commerce because the low isn't reduced then the breakout candle. . THANKS

I am running the Moutaki EA on a demo account and it never took the GU short so will be the filter not part of the EA. . Meaning the EA understands enough now not to enter commerce?

Thanks,

Sanchez

---

I would need to say the jury is still out.

You will get as many pips on the downside if actually it moves the management of the indiors. . However the reverse is true. . You will never lose as many if the transaction wasn't meant to be and turns contrary to your standing

but I do look for do see exactly what the outcomes would be in 30days cause I am certain your keep track if you did both. . And if your using a demonion to start w/ you should run to demos.

Turbo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ;

Yes that is very true when you observe the system to exactly how it was designed. . However I think the poster is meaning if you'd like to be ultra conservative you could wait for a finished candle on the opposite side of the demand line which is not touching rather then opening a commerce upon seeing the open of the candle is on the southside of the demand line.

To me it is logical. . You wont get as many pips on the downside if actually it moves the path of the indiors. . However the reverse is true. . You wont lose as many if the transaction Wasn't meant to be and turns contrary to your standing

Sanchez

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ;

You dont wait for the bar to close. . .just wait for it to transcend the prior non

---

Oh, surpassing... now this is a better choice of word. Lol https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/1527465287.jpg

Yes, I'm likely to agree then. https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/1527465287.jpg

I believe its a good idea to look for filters. With this filter which was described in the first post I would have avoided those losses which I had yesterday.
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/1527465287.jpg

another diluting transaction (which can be averted with this filter)
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/1527465288.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ;

since the 1st candle that started beneath the trend line didn't go below the bottom of the candle that broke the trend line that I waited till it closed to make sure it didn't return over the trend line. After it closed and that I noticed the reject it was a great opportunity to go short.
Keep in mind that's a 1 hour chart I used to place my 4 hour trend on the market. It sounds complex but lets me see more price action detail.

---

Great idea!!!!!