Page 14 of 5026 FirstFirst ... 4121314151624 ... LastLast
Results 131 to 140 of 255

Thread: Lost Sock Evolution - Automated

  1. #131
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    I am going to test 10 pairs using default lot at TF 1 min. This is my trade explorer lively's Profile @ forexintuitive
    Added your Revolution trader to the thread. . .for whatever reason, I cannot select 2 of my own accounts...

    Thank you for the post, dude!

    \m/

  2. #132
    Alright...

    So, why $200 a pair, you might be asking??

    Why not just $200 and operate one pair??

    It's like that. . .working using Evolution, I have observed a DD of around $1100, operating on 7 pairs - Giving a Max Requirement of $150 ish - thus far!!

    Because Revolution shows a little more restraint in logic, $200 should more than keep the accounts afloat in just about any market condition. . .Almost!
    But. . .with revealing restraint, there might be a lot larger gaps between transactions which need to be cost. . .meaning. . .though we should up to an account operate fast and a market trend change, there could be a lot of transactions in play due to being aggressive.

    Triggering seems to be correct in the Strat Tester, but shit can change FAST when comes time to live trading.

    Now. . .part of the achievement in Evolution is since it can be a little more competitive meaning that it is going to increase the profitability. . .but in this, in addition, it increases the risk.

    I understand. . .simple, right...

    Add more money to your live account and only bank the gains...

    And. . .yeah, this can definitely be done. . .can already be carried out using Evolution, but the concept is to potentially have a larger lot size in trade on smaller accounts...

    Again. . .looking at what is available for up and running grid traders, a number of them will be profitable with $5k in. . .but having worked with Martingale or lot Cost Averaging, I will tell you that a single day can turn your account . . .and your broker will not even send you a Thank You Email.

    Safety First!

  3. #133
    Aggressive Cost Averaging!

    For those that were about the Falling Knives thread, you understand that I had at one point, added in a Hyper Aggressive Triggering logic which would function to price average out - directionally.

    Well. . .this worked but over the long term. . .ended up with accounts in ash and a lot too easy to overload single pairs in exchange locking the account at typically 200 trades, which are currently running FAST against youpersonally, with no ability to maintain on a hedge...

    With previous logic, the Sum of All trades required to be above a minimal profit point to shut out. . .this was a part of the issue...

    What if we now have a separate - Make or Break Bot - which can stand set up to hammer fucking trades on a per pair basis to help get shit cleaned up??

    Given that the Current Core will probably require sums of trades above a minimal balance to shut out the worst positions, getting aggressive with this, may actually make a lot more sense...

    Moving to fuck about with this thought over the next short period of time and if I could get triggering set properly and produce an idea that works. . .may look to bring this into the thread tools.

    Really. . .as long since the Magic Number from the EA that is hyper-close is just like current and active trades. . .logic should continue to rapid fire to save trade EA or any grid.

    Risk?

    FUCK YEAH!

    But. . .effectively calculated, might be the difference between getting an account or gradually watching it die a horrible death.

  4. #134
    Ya see. . .it may be EASY as tripping until trades get closed to flooding and directionally only using place. . .and then, it stops working!

    Check it...

    two Areas where we have potential to price average out. . .and you can see where the trades have been shut out by a number of the positions. . .but there is nevertheless a fist full of these motherfuckers available...

  5. #135
    So...
    Earlier on in the thread, we looked in coding and one particular case. . .applied directionally.

    Inserted Code if((b==0 if((s==0
    These are the principal triggers...

    By removing these, we could only use the...

    Inserted Code if(bgt;0 if (sgt;0
    Meaning, there must be open trades in order to participate the hyper triggering. . .if all of these motherfuckers are closed. . .the logic will not know to take a trigger and you could be able to sit back. . .wipe the sweat off your forehead and you not only live to fight another day. . .but have a couple of extra shekels from the account...

    It's a neat idea. . .to be sure, but will have to have criteria with sufficient grid distance and set to not always trigger waves of trades. . .by leaving positions that are rogue !

    That may be dangerous!

    Will definitely need some ponder time with this thought and can see what can be done. . .but I think this idea has well and potential. . .why not giver a whirl, right?

  6. #136

  7. #137
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    quote Hey dude, Looks like you got lost in the shuffle. . .given your new position, I cannot send you a PM... Give the current version a whirl for acclimated..get some posts under your belt and we'll get you in on a few of the next rounds. If all works out using the Testers revolution wills be running . . .we're only a couple weeks away from full public release. Thanks for the interest and Welcome to FF!
    Yep seems so! I have been a Lurker for about a year, but never bothered to establish an account, guess that will teach me! I'll give the current version a go.

  8. #138
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    quote Yep seems so! I've been a Lurker for probably around a year, but never bothered to set up an account, guess that'll teach me! I'll offer the current version a go.
    lol...

    1. With this kind of patience, you'll be better off in market...
    2. If it sounds too good to be true. . .it probably is...

    There'll be lots of ops to become in. . .and really I could email you if you submitted an addy. . .but should caution you on this.

    I did this about 8 years back and have been receiving nothing but ads for Russian Ladies and Penis Enlargement products. . .which brings me to my next point...

    Anybody interested in a group buy on some of this shit??

    lol



    Cheers dude. . .hope to keep seeing you!

  9. #139
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    quote Additional your Revolution trader to the thread. . .for whatever reason, I cannot pick 2 of my accounts... Thank you for the article, dude! \m/
    Changed shit up a little...

    Since lively has been running Evolution because a public release and running it on the very same pairs. . .it indies a confirmation of trading.

    Because my Revolution trader has a lot more pair data, might be more prudent to have this as a showcase.

    Win. . .lose. . .or draw...

    Significant for all to comprehend risk:reward.

  10. #140
    Yet another ticket for the series!

    Could always use a little more information...

    If you work with Renko or Range bars and are considering analyzing Revolution. . .drop down a response here.

    Would really like to get a looksie to affirm these ideas will interpret!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to store session information to facilitate remembering your login information, to allow you to save website preferences, to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners more information