Ohh Man, I know eventually I will regret this but I will put it down to my own feeling of insufficient contribution toforexintuitiveover the last few weeks.
I reserve the right to neglect in reaction without predjudice.

Trading Fundamentals fall right into IMO 3 distinct ogaries...

1) Crossovers... MA's, BB, Oscillators... and the list goes on. sorry if I missed the fav.

Two ) Rigid Lines... Pivots, Fibs, Trendlines. . .and the list goes on.

3) Breaks...A compendium of 1) two ) and a few different idiosycracies of both added in as well as the occasional person'Break' scenario.

Please think about which of those above are more likely to sway Traders from 1 side of the fence to another. my opinion later in article

1) Crossovers... Fictitious compilation
NEWS FLASH!
Traders! That the 20 EMA has Crossed BELOW that the 40 MA. We recommend you SELL based on 20 Bar Old Information.

Two ) Rigid Lines...Fictitious compilation
The 38.2% fib failed to include the price and therefore we're left with no other comment except to state that the 50% Fib 50 percent isn't really a Fib are another Test. Let us see before we pick what happens there.

3) Breaks...Fictitious compilation
For the last 2 periods months, weeks, days or minutes the Price has failed to break'x'.
This implies that for the past 2 periods either the Bulls or Bears are the Enemy in the headquarters and beating on the door. I adore and look for all these scenarios. They are a Spring loading for Rapid Recoil or growth. [Spronnnng]What would YOU expect should they manage to crush that door down?
Exactly! Pamplona in Fast Forward or Fast Rewind.
A Quick release of energy!

Point being that, although I do not 100% Nominal the Price is King enthusiasts, I do understand that professional, including worker Traders are seeing for Price Breaks not'x' Pips Profit.
The sophmore Price is King pupil is farther ahead but still has a long row to hoe.
25 years IN still learing.
Chickened out on submitting the System Par. Sorry.