too bad...Originally Posted by ;
Thanks!Originally Posted by ;
Your audusd spike might be the exact same problem, Justin may have the ability to assist here...
I really hope we get some clarifiions about TTOs so we could nevertheless use them!
Actually, now that I consider it, I really don't think it's the same issue since the spike reappeared after many hours. If it was a busted trade, the spike would not have been put back, I would imagine. Is the spike to your busted trade still showing in your charts?Originally Posted by ;
Yes, I would sure like to keep using themso let us hope there is some way they could program a security method in keeping the set together constantlyOriginally Posted by ;
Im not yet actively trading on EFX (awaiting EUR accounts), but id like to know how frequently trades get busted? If you browse Turbos ODL currenex thread, then it seems trades on multibank-platforms get busted on a fairly routine basis. And I would like to know, on what basis do they get busted, based on which principles, and who decides that they get busted? Is it all in the discretion of the broker or the bank? This whole company that is trade-busting appears to be intrasparent to me.
Gidnoa-
As you now know, your situation has been solved to your liking. Please be aware that while you should contact MB originally with trade issues during our non-customer service hours at this moment, I'd love to make two points.
1)In early October, EFX will be going to 24-hour support, so all calls should come to us.
2)Whatever trade problem arises with MB, you have to also ensure that you contact US. We're your broker, and when we do not know that you are with an issue, we can not go to bat for you. We do not take four days to respond to any issue, and as you know from our private conversation, you never told us this had happened.
Concerning the Limit TTO scenario, I have done some study. Obviously, we've got thousands and thousands of orders placed daily on our platform, so that I moved back to work out the following:
How many times was there a market”spike” that was a bad data issue that resulted in bad fills? (only a handful throughout the last year)
Just how many orders were busted in that spike? (a tiny fraction of our total orders)
I subsequently compared only those amounts over three weeks to the number of orders that we run in 3 months. It was an small fraction of total transactions.
I then took that number and assessed for examples where the first trade triggered and then another piece of the trade was entered and ended up executing. It turns out that we needed to refund on less transactions than I could count on both hands in the last year for this.
So in other words, your situation with placing order entry and exit ahead of time, acquiring the entry trigger and after get busted, but having the exit piece perform, leaving you with a position opposite of your original trade is so infrequent that it can not be quantified. I'm talking less than 0.01percent of orders, likely much less. And in the instances that I'm aware of, including yours, we reimbursed the reduction. Not sure I can answer it deeper than that.
Someone changed the title of this thread from Big issue with EFX.... To question seeing EFX... - this is beyond belief.
As Justin reported the matter was solved and that I was refunded my loss.
That I was not aware that I should contact EFX after MB contacted me and told me who to write to in order to solve this issue.
The man I contacted in MB responded to my email 20 minutes after I posted here on FF, probably Justin needed something to do with this, thanks!
I am certain these spikes happen MUCH lower than 0.01percent of the time, it reflects a threat of losing one's account because we're all using leverage, however
Justin saying they refunded these cases along with my experience reassures me for now.
Someone changed the title of this thread from Big Issue with EFX.... To question seeing EFX... - this is beyond belief. The link of moderators-brokers is much more powerful than I ever thought...
This was performed by means of a moderator to better express the character of the ribbon. Your problem was answered, It makes for more efficient searching of forums...
This has been a long standing policy atforexintuitiveand is needed. forexintuitivealso reserves the right to move threads from one forum to another to better organize them.
This occurs with all threads, not only Broker threads.
Due
Might have something to do with the fact that it wasn't a large problem and you have everything you wanted. LOL.Originally Posted by ;
Allow me to see if I can piece this all together from what you guys wrote.
You had a problem with the platform and were in contact with MBT but not EFX. MBT took more than you wished to solve the issue (by days), so that you posted this board both below the regular EFX thread AND started a new thread saying Big problem with EFX... even though you had never told EFX about the problem. Could have simply contacted EFX and had the problem resolved quickly, but instead, they needed to see your board together with the negative impliions of significant problem with EFX which each person readingforexintuitivecould see and would naturally presume there was something wrong with the EFX system.
Despite that, EFX got about the matter immediately and got the problem fixed in that which you both seem to acknowledge was approximately 20 minutes. And you can't see why the Moderators, who waited until this was solved, wouldn't change the board title?
I sometimes wonder how Justin puts up with any of us.
Not sure how to spell I-caramba.
Should I switch it to Big problem with MB.... then? Can you think this title will hold? LOL
Originally Posted by ;