Article for FXCM??
Printable View
Article for FXCM??
I have to agree, however they or the biggest, so that they could brag a little.Quote:
Originally Posted by ;
haha yeah. Well at least you can take it like a fantastic contrast for how a much more established broker likes to present itself vs a non-established one. The non-established one believed that by simply presenting themselves as if they have sufficient funds they will instantly become reliable. This demones those types of smoke and mirrors have to be watched out for. It has to be.Quote:
Originally Posted by ;
There's nobody bigger then oanda, fxcm, gft, interbankfx., a forex just broker, this is true.
Hey Moe,From what I understand from talking to other brokers it is tremendously contrary to their non-disclosure agreements to give the titles of the liquidity providers. Every other broker I've ever spoken to wasn't allowed to tell. I wonder IBFX would risk that...Quote:
Originally Posted by ;
My guess is that IBFX are discovering themselves a bit under stress lately.Quote:
Originally Posted by ;
It would be quite surprising if the banks mentioned previously were their liquidity providers. Can you see these banks dealing with micro/mini accounts? https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/1526301734.png
that is the answer they gave me, I simply can not find those bank dealing with micro lots, which makes me think that ibfx must put customers order together until those banks would take this order, all this can be done with no deal desk, even if you have the right program.Quote:
Originally Posted by ;
Oh, you mean GS doesn't allow you to trade $1,000 at one time? I've said this before, be VERY leary of any firm that claim things which are too good to be true. At the person's reaction from Interbank, they basically contracted themselves - we pass on the trades directly through to one of our liquidity providers. . .so they really do operate a desk. If they claim they have some intuitive blackbox which automatically pushes the transaction to the appropriate Bid/Ask, they do not. . .as MT4s backoffice is not so sophistied. Hence, firms like Gain and IFX Markets (and probably FXCM) do or will be offering the MT4 user interfact with THEIR OWN backoffice.Quote:
Originally Posted by ;
Hi ForexSean...
The MT4 back office does not process the best bid/ask - which is accurate. . However, there's a program that manages the feeder files and sends the ideal bid ask through to the MT platforms.
As for the smaller lot sizes. . You're right, the bigger banks don't need those trades. The small ones sent and have been netted.
Just so we're all upfront. . I perform for IBFX. Maybe not here to cause difficulties or get growled at... but I used to devote a bit of time about the IBFX forum that the Equis forum before that. . We had to take our IBFX forum down because of possible liability problems so I was searching for a new spot to talk to traders.
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/1526301734.png M
Welcome to the forum Marilyn. Too bad about your forum. Where it went, I had been wondering.