View Full Version : HYBRID: trading system within a trading system
No guy can ch all of the fluctuations....Jesse Livermore....
FRACTALS/HYBRID:trading system in a trading system
Generally, high win rate(high win:loss) tends to include reduced risk/reward; or vice versa: the greater the risk/reward the reduced the win rate.
A trading system which unite win/loss of about 60% along with a regular 8R into 20R(r/r of 1:8 or 1:20) are extremely rare, if they even exist in any way. That's my small observation relating to trading.
AXIOM: Any machine using a tall R/R ratio should use a greater timeframe for setups and reduced time frames for entry. The larger the differential, the better.
Now, how does one take care of this bad win:loss ratio which plagues such a system.
You will find other solutions, of course. However, would be to combine/hybridized a system on a lower time using a trend trading system of time frame. In other words, enter the entry point of your scalp(1mins into 15mins), but use the PT of this trending trading system(H4 to weekly). In case the system features the tendency system, 60% and above; and a decent win/loss of state has a decent win/loss of state 60% and above. We are in business. Of course, there is going to be a dose of breakevens, this really is the character of the monster. It is essentially a trading system in a trading system. A hybrid vehicle. This is ideal for high risk/reward, of say, 8R or 20R using a win rate of 60%. It's risking around 4pips to 15 pips to make 100pips to 243 pips or higher.
Trend trading breakouts for my high time frame egy has this structure.
Http://www.forex-mail.com/images/trend1.png
The greater time frame methodologies are: swinging/wave movements and polygonal breakouts on the daily frame using lower 1/8th or 1/4th b-p-c. (BREAKOUT - PULLBACK - CONTINUATION). I am sure that there are others, but these are the ones that I personally know to result in 60% gain rate or greater.
For Your scalping method: One trading method which I found to have at least 60% success rate at 1min to 15mins time frame are ascending or descending triangle breakout, which ran, pullback, and then continue in the direction of the breakout. With entrance in the reversal candle in the bottom of the pullback.
From my private study, I notice this method works in all time frames. Lets called this by acronym: TBPC
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/151863519778453433.jpg
As such, the combination of both:using the greater time frame trend trading to place the PT and the lower timeframe TBPC to place the entry yields a top win:loss with a 10 to 20 r:r.
This is the frame. There's not anything groundbreaking here. It's simply a combination of two practices. I will begin posting live pops
IN A NUTSHELL:
All these systems are simply little variations of the same thing.
(1)find a strong, simple system on a greater timeframe that has a good win/loss of 60% or greater; using a 1:1 to 1:3 r/r
(2) find a simple, robust system onto a LOWER TIME FRAME with a good win/loss plus an adequate r/r of state 1:1 to 1:3.
(3) merge the two together. When using the TP of the time frame for exit, use as your entry the time frame methodology. Sometimes, it is the system in the 4hr or daily timeframe that is currently replied on time frame that is 1mins or a 5mins, inside itself. That is the way I understand to obtain an adequate win/loss ratio using a decent R/R of state, 1: 8 to 1:20(especially, if the installation is monthly or weekly, and the entry is 1 or 2 5mins.) . Of course, breakevens increases. And win/loss drops because of 1mins' sound. . .that is the reason why I look far away from news.
(4)Use only price action. Trade with the trend. Avoid news.
__________________________________________________ _____________________
__________________________________________________ _____________________
ADDENDUM: helpful threads that I adapted from:
Assembling an equity millipede
Trend Trading All Pairs
Central Banks Big Players
Trading with Deadly Truth
DanUK's Advanced Trend Trading Strategy
My method of trading by Employing trend line , BL line febo level
Don't hesitate to post it, if anybody has a fantastic idea for a system that ches R : R using higher WIN: LOSS or a system. (but be forewarned, it will be rigorously analyzed). Because r/r that is high and higher win/loss are very rare.
Clearly, I dont use indiors. Others do, and it works for them. It is not my style. I use pure price action and readings of fundamentals.
p.s. I ALSO USE FUNDAMENTALS IN DETERMINING TREND DIRECTION.
JUST ADDED: I almost forgot. The change candle creation I look for on the 5mins is the inverted hammer/hammer.
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/1518635206696831077.jpg
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/1518635206118463149.jpg
Sounds interesting, what pairs are you currently trading and do you have some charts with setups?
Thanks,
Neil I will start posting actual installations beginning from tomorrow.
attachments.
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/15186352082034012810.jpg
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/15186352102138152824.jpg
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/1518635212540194593.jpg
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/1518635214872837765.jpg
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/15186352161205784127.jpg
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/15186352191029914229.jpg
more attachments
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/15186352211049019211.jpg
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/15186352251321403753.jpg
-- 3 to 5 times fad in 1 direction
-- followed by consolidation(30mins into 4hr. Preferably a 4hr consolidation)
-- breakout at the direction of this trend. Search on 1min time frame for BPC. Utilize as SL = 10 pips disperse. TP = 90% of average daily range.
That is a combination of hectors LOB(THE VIDEOS under) https://forexintuitive.com/forex-trading-and-cfds/97944-personal-journal-gravy-train.html Hector's LOB utilizes 15mins bpc. WHILE TONY USES minutes. I OPT for 1min. Hectors time frame is 3am to 4am us EST time. That's my time frame.
UPSIDES:that provides a r/r of 1:5 into 1:9; Downside? lots of breakevens. I B/E the trade at 1:1.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/FreqllPAemA?origin=https://www.forexintuitive.com
MORE ON hector's LOB:
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Ts8HBUwk3PU?origin=https://www.forexintuitive.com
https://www.youtube.com/embed/eaIE4QanaqU?origin=https://www.forexintuitive.com
attachments. cad/chf r/r 1:8. No entrances.
cad/jpy r/r 1:12.7. No entries either.
The procedure is also a modified hector trades. Waiting following a 1,2,3 formation to get a bpc on the trendline.
Through the creation of the bpc, go to 1min time frame, and loe yet again loe a 1,2,3 formation around the 1min. Draw another trendline and look off that internal trendline that is 1min. Then enter at the completion of the bpc. Employing the peak of both spread (from the 1,2,3 of 1min) as SL.
This gives the huge r/r while exploiting the high win ratio of hector's trend trading 3sma.
POLYGONAL BREAKOUTS.
Whenever there's a h1 or h4 bpc from daily or weekly octogonal trendlines. With the breakout being just 2 candles before a pullback, and also the continuation candles not 3 candles. I discovered that the price goal of measured movement projection of the BPC tends to be attained. The win/ratio is%. The downside? The r/r is simply 1:1. The occurrence of those breakouts only occurs roughly twice a week.
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/15186352291176009882.jpg
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/15186352311384603494.jpg
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/15186352342013980492.jpg
POLYGONAL BREAKOUTS.
Whenever there's a h1 or h4 bpc from daily or weekly octogonal trendlines. With the breakout being just 2 candles before also the continuation, along with a pullback candles not candles. I discovered that the price target of quantified move projection of the BPC tends to be attained. The win/ratio is very large:75%. The drawback? The r/r is only 1:1. The occurrence of those breakouts only happens roughly twice a week. POLYGONAL BREAKOUTS part 2
The question is, how can I potential exploit this large win ratio that has a fantastic r/r? That is why I decided to delve into the BPC itself using a time frame that is 1min input after a 1,2,3 conclusion followed by a bpc.
The breakdown:
--LOOK for POLYgonal breakouts on the daily or even weekly. (with two factors touching the trendline). On rare occasions use h4(with three factors touching the trendlines.
-- look for bpc on h4 or h1.
--Move to 5mins time frame over the bpc has it's touching the trendline where the breakout happens. Start looking for 1,2,3 formation.
--draw inner trendline on the 1,2,3 formation.
--await a bpc of their inner trendline on the 1min. Enter at conclusion of bpc.
--Use the summit of the 2 spread on the 1,2,3 as SL.
--B/E the transaction when price goes straight back to the starting point of their inner trendline.
-TP #1 . Exit at quantified move projection of the h4 or h1 bpc.
--TP # 2. Move ride the fashion, and SL to the mouth of the H1 OR H4 bpc if trend-friendly.
--that the Breakout candles can't be over two candles.
ADDENDUM: GENERALLy, the r/r between the entry at 1min and also the mouth of this 1hr or 4hr bpc can be between 1:3 to 1:5. Subsequently added the projection of 1hr or 4hr bpc. . .that makes it a total of 1:6 to 1:10. That in my experience has 75% chance of hitting that forwards projected bpc.
UPSIDE: PT target has a 75% probability of hitting ; r/r between 1:6 and 1:10.
Disadvantage: pattern appears to occur just TWICE a week, with failures at least two times a month. Since using 1mins. . .breakeven has increased. Entry losses has increased. . .1min entry win/rate as dropped below 75%. (because sometimes, there is a bp....and no c....I give up on call whether it drops under 61% FIB(with 50% at the breakout trendline)
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/15186352361238617496.jpg
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/1518635238548362719.jpg
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/1518635240155978955.jpg
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/15186352422031679186.jpg
In a nutshell these systems are little variations of the identical thing.
(1)loe a robust, simple method on a higher time frame that has a fantastic win/loss of 60 percent or higher; with a 1:1 to 1:3 r/r
(2) loe a simple, robust method onto a LOWER TIME FRAME with a fantastic win/loss plus a decend r/r of say 1:1 to 1:3.
(3) merge the two together. While inputting on time frame that is lower utilize the TP of the higher time frame for exit. It is the system in the 4hr or daily timeframe that is currently duplied on a 5mins or even 1mins time frame, within itself. That is the way I understand to obtain a decent win/loss ratio with a respectable R/R of say, 1: 8 to 1:20(particularly, if the installation is monthly or weekly, and the entry is 1 or 2 5mins.) . Of course, breakevens increases. And win/loss drops because of 1mins' noise. . .that is I look far from red-labeled news.
(4)Use purely price action. Trade with the trend. Keep away from news.
cad/chf r/r 1:8. No multiple entrances.
cad/jpy r/r 1:12.7. No multiple entries either.
That the method is also a modified hector trades. Waiting following a 1,2,3 formation to get a bpc on the internal trendline.
During the creation of this bpc, go to 1min time period, and loe yet again loe a 1,2,3 formation on the 1min. Draw another internal trendline and look off that trendline that is 1min. Enter at the completion of that bpc. Using the peak of both spread (from the 1,2,3 of 1min) as SL.
This offers the huge r/r whilst harnessing... Really great thread -- I love methods with higher R :R and know just how rare they are. Is this the principal method you exchange everyday (modified Hector) since you seem to possess detailed performance information on it? Do you get setups each day? What is a bpc?
Thanks for the great examples, hope you keep posting them.
Truly great thread -- I love methods with high R :R and understand how rare they are. Is this the main method you trade regular (modified Hector) since you appear to have detailed performance info on it? Can you get setups each day? What's a bpc?
Thank you for the excellent examples, hope you keep posting them. bpc= breakout, pullback, continuation.
ON FREQUENCY:
the modified hector 3sma I get about 1 to 4 per week. It changes a lot.
The modified hector lob tony112 I get about 1 to 2 per week. I DONT recall ever having more.
The modified polygonal breakouts I get 2 per week. I never once had anything.
The swings trade that https://forexintuitive.com/forex-trading-and-cfds/97945-rustseldor-journal.html I get about 1 per 2days. Sometimes 1 per day. Perhaps I must create a thread for each method. Not to confuse matters.
bpc= breakout, pullback, continuation.
ON FREQUENCY:
the modified hector 3sma I receive about 1 to 4 per week. It varies a lot.
The modified hector lob tony112 I get about 1 to 2 per week. I DONT recall ever having more than two.
The modified polygonal breakouts I get twice weekly. I never had anything greater than that.
The swings trade that https://forexintuitive.com/forex-trading-and-cfds/97952-trading-journal.html I receive around 1 per 2days. Occasionally 1 daily. Perhaps I must create a thread for each method. Not... Thanks for answering my query. I see you've divided up the methods into separate threads. Since the RR is very good -- are these the methods that you mostly use to exchange, but it feels like you do not get mainly transactions from such signals?
Thank you for answering my question. In addition, I see the approaches've split into separate threads. Since the RR is very good -- are the approaches you use to exchange, but it seems like you do not get mainly transactions from these signals?
I made the decision to use various threads....thinking it could make things less confusing.
yes. These are my approaches.
I dont get many transactions per method. Aggregrate trade from all approaches have a tendency to net about 4 favorable trades each week to me. There are trading setups which I cant take due to news...e.g.i cant require a current eur/aud trade due to severe, reddish AUD news(there was only one right today in EUR/AUD https://forexintuitive.com/discussion-trading/97927-correlation-pairs.html
there are others that results in a reduction--nothing is 100%. There are many others who are breakevens....at that the end of the week I tend to have 4 favorable trades each week.
Thank You for sharing. It has frequently come to my head, why don't you merge 2 approaches ( 1 on greater TF, one on reduced TF ) in order to realize a better R:R.
so that I would propose to leave it as is, because the genuine idea is that the flexible approach you're sharing. Just my 2 pennies.
Once again thank you.
___________
michael
Thank You for sharing. It has often come to my mind, why don't you merge 2 methods ( 1 on greater TF, one on lower TF ) in order to achieve a greater R:R.
So I would propose to leave it as is, because the real notion is the elastic approach you're sharing. Just my 2 pennies.
Once again thank you.
___________
michael
I appreciate it. It makes sense to me. There clearly was a trading setup in eur/jpy that I took but wasnt able to post live...I will try to do as many live installment I can. It is the modified hector 3sma installation...I took the trade with my mobile program....when I got home...https://forexintuitive.com/forex-trading-and-cfds/97940-kicks.html
I'm quickly looking around for the LOB TONY112 TRADES now. . .SINCE it is 3am EST TIME
-- 3 to 5 days trend in 1 direction
-- followed by consolidation(30mins into 4hr. Rather a 4hr consolidation)
-- breakout at the direction of the trend. Look on 1min time period for BPC. Use as SL = 10 pips spread. TP = 90% of average daily range.
That is a combination of hectors LOB(THE VIDEOS below) https://forexintuitive.com/discussion-trading/97936-common-sense-systems-software.html Hector's LOB utilizes 15mins bpc. WHILE TONY USES seconds. I OPT for 1min. Hectors time period is 3am to 4am us EST time. That is my time period too.
UPSIDES:that... A CAD/JPY TRADE HAS BEEN TRIGGERED. LOB TONY112. . .with entry on the 1min...r/r 1:6.6. B/E AT 1:1
-- 3 to 5 times trend in one direction
-- followed by consolidation(30mins into 4hr. Preferably a 4hr consolidation)
-- breakout at the direction of this trend. Look for BPC. Utilize as SL = 10 pips spread. TP = 90 percent of average daily range.
This is a mixture of hectors LOB(THE VIDEOS under) https://forexintuitive.com/forex-trading-and-cfds/97917-trader-dale-daily-trading-levels.html Hector's LOB utilizes 15mins bpc. WHILE TONY USES seconds. I OPT for 1min. Time frame is 3am to 4am EST time to us. That's my time period.
UPSIDES:that... I supposed to say 3am to 5am.
without bpc. But with a candle breakout on 1min.
I never accepted these transactions, but just took a fast overview of some of the transactions I didnt take because there was shortage of BPC...(this activity was motivated by a personal conservation about how to increase my egy. Thank you)
EUR/CHF, CAD/CHF, GBP/CAD. . .of course, all these are LOB type transactions between 3am and 5am EST..
I have emphasized the powerful candle breakouts in rectangle.
P.S I will look for others like this to understand what's up....potential candle candidates: marubozu; one-sided, short wick marubozu; strong-looking engulfing bar. Candle size? Dont understand.
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/15186352621143013206.jpg
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/15186352651230993135.jpg
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/15186352676379406.jpg
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/1518635269468878607.jpg
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/15186352711093508140.jpg
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/1518635274874165901.jpg
exactly the exact same principle here: for these trades(eur/gpb and gbp/jpy)that passed up.
Eur/gpb breakout might not precisely fit the bill. Its candle is too tiny. But DOES. chart attached below.
The 1st GBP/JPY possible entrance will likely result in a reduction.
The 2nd gpb/jpy possible entrance is more like it, but maybe not quite. Even though it would have resulted in a profit
[observation: the 1st G/J looks more like a hammer. In reality, it's a hammer. The wick... additional examples: aud/cad, chf/jpy, eur/chf. ALL FROM FRIDAY lob setups. (THere were setups in usd/chf, gbp/chf, but didnt match the parameters of a single bar breakout alterations without bpc). The only one I really trade was that the chf/jpy, since it was the only one with BPC(to a tune of 8.5R)....the rest didnt display BPC just a one pub breakout and runaways. I thank mr. C to the modifiion suggestions.
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/151863527782530849.jpg
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/15186352792103708448.jpg
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/1518635282871508996.jpg
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/1518635284735134255.jpg
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/15186352861241688929.jpg
Temporary set of principles while I compile information:
minimal length of breakout pub? Random 10 pips. why? No good reason.
Kind of breakout pub? Marubuzo or one-sided wick marubuzo.
B/E in retracement high/low or 50% ADR or major internal trendlines of higher TF
PT= 90 percent adr
SL = rear of pub spread.
Breakout condition: LOB parameters.
Entrance time period: 1min or 5mins.
Will use the weekend to critique more trading setups.
(of course, bpc 1min is still operational, as normal.)
The trend taking a look at the dailies and weeklies and monthlies or have dropped, are falling. Clearly evidenced by the increased number of polygonal breakouts. I had just 3 trades. 1 15mins, 1 lob, 1 polygonal breakout.
What I am currently focusing on are: polygonal breakouts, in case a bpc can be snatched. In certain scenarios, LOB. (it takes 3 times of unidirectional movement, not intersecting with any major trendlines or s/r levels. )
Highly trend dependent trading techniques such as 15mins scalping and standard Hector 3sma will be infrequent and far inbetween until great trend resumes.
So, yeah, I am mostly focusing on polygonal breakouts and LOBs.
(you have to know when to trade and when to walk away. It's been a tremendous trending market for the last few months....the market is probably digesting some of the. Time to take it easy and enjoy life more; when tendencies resume, 15mins and hector sma WIll be there to use again. I dont beleive in forcing the market. I like trend. In the meantime, I exchange LOBS and daily polygonal breakouts)
not much happening, the tendency are falling or have collapsed, taking a look at the dailies and weeklies and monthlies. Evidenced by the increased variety of breakouts. I had only 3 transactions last week. 1 15mins, 1 lob, 1 polygonal breakout.
What I am currently focusing on are: polygonal breakouts, in case a bpc can be snatched. In certain cases, LOB. (it takes 3 days of unidirectional motion, not intersecting with any major trendlines or s/r levels. )
Highly trend dependent trading techniques like 15mins scalping and regular... failed a sweep: there is an interim uptrend in eur/chf and gbp/chf as a result of polygonal breakout. Before, of course, another resistance. There is an interim downtrend in chf/jpy.
Which means if price persists. . I'll be looking for LOB or scalp trade between the lines.
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/1518635303321145339.jpg
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/15186353052043469436.jpg
https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/15186353071414539798.jpg
Dddd,
I Have stumbled upon Your Own thread. With good interest, I'm trying to piece together the Hectortrader system. So far, it looks strikingly like my approach over at the GPB/JPY thread. I'm running a 77% success rate and a profit for the month of August.
Can you have a look at the ribbon give me your input?
Can anyone share the template/s with this egy? Thanks!
Dddd,
what it is that you are onto is exactly what interests me in my own pursuits for the correct egy. One of the reasons I believe so traders have problems is that they end up with a hodgepodge of version position sizing and reward/risk ratios across their entire spectrum of trades. This skews the underlying math which determine profitability. I believe in always tracking my performance to ensure I am preserving positive expectancy. For me personally, positive expectancy must be made prior to deciding upfront what minimum R/R trades I will accept pulls the trigger INTO the trades.
I certainly believe you are on the ideal path by looking for setups on greater TF and entries on reduced TF, without issue. Doing it this way literally structures your trades with significantly favorable R/R from the ground up. As you have pointed out, the main thing to overcome with trades is the of low hit rates. But like you, I don't feel that we have to resign ourselves to settle with this. My bottom-line structural requirements for my trading would be to use MAX risk per transaction and MIN 2:1 reward/risk. These are the main factors over which the trader has total control. The remaining issue is the market that the win/loss rate, which is controlled by the market. Our only real controlling power on win/loss rate lies within our ability to cherry-pick simply the maximum probability setups and entries.
Do you run any of the numbers on what a 50% win rate will create using a 5:1 RR? Assuming a trade price of 3 percent of the sum at risk, you'd return 573.66 percent every 100 trades only winning 50 trades at 5:1 R/R using 1% risk per transaction.
Here is a list of the yields for the various R/R structures from 2:1 through 10:1, all using the very same factors over 1% risk per trade, 50% hit rate, 3 percent trade costs, over 100 trades:
2:1 = 58.05 percent
3:1 = 157.46 percent
4:1 = 317.43 percent
5:1 = 573.66 percent
6:1 = 982.24 percent
7:1 = 1630.93 percent
8:1 = 2656.35 percent
9:1 = 4270.45 percent
10:1 = 6800.65 percent
I'll not give you additional amounts, but using anything over 2:1 R/R, even slight gains of your hit rate over 50% includes a phenomenal effect on your profit margin. It is FAR superior to design a trade egy that is based on and proper position sizing compared to leave those factors to chance.
Thanks, pipskateer for the conversation.
At this state, my tendency is to wait for weekly/monthly breakout or confluence before planning for the millipede run. My best r/r are bigger and larger time frames. In my humble view, those are the ones with the megapips(hundred upon hundreds or 1000 pips gain.) . Doing a followup and my personal experience on mortician's compilation convinces me of that.
Of course, I prefer things to be aligned with fundamentals.
To restrict multiple re-entries, which sometimes drop my win rate to 50 percent or sometimes, 30% over the 1 minute time period. (the higher the time period for entrance, the greater the triumph rate, but lesser the r/r; sadly, that is life for you) . I am privately interested in researching precision entries, which can be a huge change because I am a confirmation obsessed trader. One method I am currently considering right now(alien frog shipped me) is your https://forexintuitive.com/discussion-trading/97925-euro-triangle-sideways.html I am trying to blend it with this idea of momentum ratio I discovered on trend trading all of pairs. See if I can apply it. With preference for your marobozu candle.
I doubt an individual can perform more than just 1 positive millipede trades per month which wont result in B/E. Based on what I am seeing on my end.
Hey Big D,
Nice thread you've got here,. Just stumbled upon it. I shall give it a read.
Funny how I had touched on what your speaking of here.
Cheers
Bluesteele
Can anybody share the indiors template/s with this interesting egy? Thanks!
Thank you.
Hey Big D,
Nice thread you've got here,. Just stumbled upon it. I will give it a read.
Funny how I'd touched on what your speaking of here.
Cheers
Bluesteele
Your egy is as good as any. I enjoy it. Spreading the lots/units alloion is the way to go. I cannot plogically resist letting a 1000 winners return and lead to zero. I cant. https://forexintuitive.com/discussion-trading/97935-trading-platform-mac-ibook-g4.html. .and I mean, everything, until the trend shows reversal indie on the daily(reversal signal because of him is h-h turning into h-l or l-l turning into l-h). H-h= higher high/ l-l = reduced.
Mortician advoes looking for break of monthly or weekly levels....those are the ones prime for your 1000 pips runs...I stole ideas from him also. I did a subsequent follow up on the charts he submitted to check him out. . .and a few of these charts DID MADE those hundred plus a few did 1000 pips move. His brief of USD/SGD this past year in july at https://forexintuitive.com/attachments/15186353221872566755.jpg was so epic. USD/SGD finally went to max low of 1.2000. I stole ideas.
Nightmoves and Entropylad prefer a trend collapse to happen thus precipitating huge movement of hundreds of pips in the market over a few days. I stole ideas from them also.
Anyways, I might need to say that I agree with you on precision entry. . .the lack of precision entry is some of the weaknesses of the hector style. . .this made me read j16. I have been introducing precision modifiions, although I utilizes hector design. Especially after studying WMD(that ribbon is golden) and all yunero's articles in detail. This weakness of hector design is the reason why I searched out WMD thread in the first place. His degree of precision entry is uncanny. The constant demand for optimizing high r/r is the reason why I am interested with https://forexintuitive.com/forex-trading-and-cfds/97947-dilernia-model-gbp-usd.html
Anywho, I said the core of my technical trading principles here
,
What you're onto is precisely what interests me in my own pursuits for the ideal egy. One reason I believe so traders have problems is that they frequently wind up getting a hodgepodge of standing sizing and reward/risk ratios across their entire spectrum of transactions. This skews the mathematics which determine profitability. I believe in monitoring my performance to make sure I am preserving expectancy. For me personally, positive expectancy has to be made INTO the transactions before the trigger is...
Powered by forexintuitive® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 forexintuitive Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.