Thread: Bitcoin technical analysis

Bitcoin Model from FundStrat:

http://www.businessinsider.de/bitcoi...0?op=1r=USIR=T

https://cryptovest.com/news/bitcoin-...diction-model/

On daily BTC remains in corrective ABC wave 4 off the ATH - first minute target zone to get a low 12690-12355, next maximum zone a little wide at 11650-10810. Either to happen by Jan 19th. New highs for tide 5 top likely to follow.

Originally Posted by ;

I notice something anomalous ... (both in the Elliott count and at the trendline breaks) (But it's my sense ...) Abnormal since I would have anticipated a 5th one (of 3rd written : 12345=1st wave) ... ... quicker ( ... and rather is below ma200 = h4 timeframe) Abnormal since in the break of trendlines there is a pullback ... ... too pushed and another break is a trendline probably upwards (usually downwards) It would make me think of an AbC correction (we'd be inside b waves) but ... that the 12345 count = 1st wave can also be anomalous ... P.S....

I think you just summed up the whole issue with EW in 1 place

Originally Posted by ;

quote I think you just summed up the entire problem with EW in 1 article

Hey BSFilter,

It is not easy to re-elaborate them in ...
... an Escherian construct (two-dimensional: Pt)

where the model is exactly the Elliottian theory with ...
... Fibonacci (TPs)

Is it functioning?
The answer is always the usual P rofit F actor ...
(sl,%W)


P.S.
somebody wrote :
Look at the near future as ... unknowable in specifics ... but predictable in character

Originally Posted by ;

quote Hey , it isn't simple to re-elaborate them in ... ... an Escherian build (two-dimensional: Pt) where the version is precisely the Elliottian theory with ... ... Fibonacci (TPs) Is it working? The answer is obviously the customary profit variable ... (sl...%W) P.S. someone wrote : Look at the near future since ... unknowable in specifics ... but predictable in nature

Comparing spot FX into an escherian build, probably the best thing I've ever read onforexintuitive!

Originally Posted by ;

quote Comparing spot FX into an escherian construct, probably the best thing I've ever read onforexintuitive!

Hey BSFilter,

I have always wondered how much of importance appears ...
... in an Escherian frame.

If the complementary part were randomness,
it'd be enough to link the outline of this layout to
the whole field of the painting.

A distressing result if ...

... we appeared in the multidimensional universe
so the two-dimensional Escherian thought
would affirm

P.S.
PF

Oh, dipped ~12800, buy buy buy, or so they say.

Update of my BTC chart. Wishing it's going to reach that bottom area first, I am waiting. .

Virtually hit the 100 percent retracement from the D leg completion of this gartly pattern. Once broken, it will go farther down to the trendline. Still waiting.

Wat with Bitcoin? fallen below 12K