Ok final one before bed, 10 so far. If one of my bitches wakes me up, I'll move the cease
Edit
Stuff it, I am out goodnight everyone
![]()
![]() |
![]() |
Ok final one before bed, 10 so far. If one of my bitches wakes me up, I'll move the cease
Edit
Stuff it, I am out goodnight everyone
![]()
That has been nice to wake up to - Paradox 40, thanks guys. Still learning, such asking kung fu with spaghetti though.
![]()
Nice one OJ, are you live, I presume so as you have mentioned about the stoploss, you can defeat a 40 stoploss by lowering your position down, once you do so with quite minimal to lose, if you do, then getting it right when you do so will fill you with confidence.Originally Posted by ;
Sry. . But has nothing to do with TMS--Originally Posted by ;
I really ask myself why Tekkies and Lisat aren t fighting like hell against this cluttered view.
The last year that they didn t stop barking.
CCI??Originally Posted by ;
Not on paradox, because I do not have 10 trades in a row. Believe it or not, these are the principles.Originally Posted by ;
Not have to apologise ,I was only having a bit of fun.Originally Posted by ;
It functions, only aesthetically displeasing.
I will leave you guys to it...
Ok, so let's see who is paying attention?
Yesterday's trade of the day again as a recap, for purposes of comparison;
and todays attempt, (hopefully you can see some sort of pattern emerging here!) ;
I had been waiting patiently with limit order in that level, but I didn't expect it to go in this straight line! ;
My EW opinion was that the pullback extended this day was corrective and consequently we should publish fresh temptations, but it's quite tricky to hold once revisiting previous demand.
Incidentally, it's my EW view which suggests to me the probability of further lows (continuation of overall larger trend). When I see lots of crossovers, especially in 'abcde' expanding/contracting diagonals and 3 wave abc 'B' waves separating them, it just gives the 'head'.
Probability, that is all it's and certainly worth looking for the reaction off of the previous subwave to the left.
So, I could have held for a little longer.... Hello ho;
![]()
Hello Cableguy,Originally Posted by ;
Wonderful!
I have been following all your articles. It is wonderful! You just nailed it. It has been a problem for me to rely on those waves that are tiny. I got very bleak. I found very hard to rely on them.
Ken
Here's a prime example of the Aforementioned;
UJ;
Quit to BE and unfortunately, not what we were Searching for;
![]()