Thread: $10 to $80,000 in 13 trades

I am highly interested in this, I've tried it a couple of time but always end up getting cold feet particularly when I am just going beyond 1,000$. . .mine is usually 100$ beginning balance....with you with this Guy

Originally Posted by ;

quote is that the likelihood of getting 13 successive win trades?

Yes. (Actually 12 because I did'nt count the first).
From 0 it is 50 percent =gt; 1:8192; 60%=gt; 1:460; 70 percent =gt; 1:103

Originally Posted by ;

I am highly interested in this, I've tried it a few time but always wind up getting chilly feet particularly when I am only going beyond 1,000$. . .mine is usually 100$ starting balance....with you on this guy

we only got to find the best way to achieve it. It's surely possible, well ask any1 dat was wiped out by a matingale system.

Originally Posted by ;

quote we only got to find the best way to attain it. It's certainly possible, well ask any1 dat had been wiped out with a matingale system.

To have the ability to carry this out, we could look to decrease to risk by half....so you risk 50% to get 100% reward on each trade....it greatly increases the chances of avoiding a margin call, the plan is to have your funds protected sufficient to keep fighing as opposed to blow it using one mistake as taking 13 consecutive trades all winners is tough.
You could look to take trades using 50 pips SL and 100 pip TP

Subs. Thanks and
Regards

Originally Posted by ;

quote Hi, it can be carried out. (I did 10) x3 it's a lot harder now due to margin rates being excessively large. Some guie, you need to be special with the transactions and for a better option, compound 5 and also have a little bit of profit then do another 5. You'll perfect your best options.... If I compound now I normally only trade 3 transactions.... It's all about odds and probabilities. Trade well and keep your head.

By compounding you mean ?

Originally Posted by ;

Who can achieve 13 consecutive winning trades with a risk reward ratio of 1:1. Risking the whole quantity and therefore doubling equity. Might it be possible? Any1 up for the challenge? Risk will always remain only $10 I've seen 16 consecutive reds in roulette so wats the chances of picking the very large probability trade setups, and remember consecutives happen very often in roulette with only a 48% bias, and that is why the martingale egy consistently fails. So wont it be much more inclined to acquire consecutive wins such as that in forex in which u have control...

you may have noticed 16 straight wins but that stat means nothing if you are not investigating further. A trader might have 16 straight wins but how many times was that the commerce's money direction not respected. This boils down to in depth analysis of every trade. You would also have to have an notion of how thesystem works to be certain that those wins are following the system

Originally Posted by ;

quote To have the ability to carry out this, we can look to reduce to risk by half....so you risk 50% to get 100% reward on every trade....it greatly increases the chances of avoiding a margin call, the egy is to always have your funds protected enough to keep fighing rather than blow it with a single mistake as taking 13 consecutive transactions all winners is hard. You could look to take trades with 50 pips SL and 100 pip TP

You're expected Rmeans little once you are in. You could have a fantastic Rbut a super low likelihood that tp hits. That's why one ought to take a look at transactions and look deep into every one as it shall reveal several things concerning the trader!

Originally Posted by ;

quote is that the likelihood of having 13 consecutive win transactions?

Nobody could calculate that chance without knowing exactly how the systsysteesystsysteem works.

Originally Posted by ;

quote Hi Vishaal, I recommend you take a peek at this: https://forexintuitive.com/forex-tra...ormations.html Good fortune for your adventure! picture

The quewn needs evidence of those wins. A simple annotation of a dead chart doesn't even recognise that you took those trades.

Originally Posted by ;

quote The quewn needs evidence of those wins. A simple annotation of a deceased chart doesn't even recognise that you took those trades.

No1 has claimed to have achieved it' just a matter of sharing ideas. Maybe it isn' potential. Maybe it is. We're just trying here

Interesting concept...